| For many companies, the idea of relocating
or establishing a new location within any market can be difficult,
but overcoming these challenges overseas can be daunting. Ensuring
that the process is done correctly – that the key stakeholders
have been involved, all
criteria are identified and analysed, and your company has received
the maximum value for its investment – can make the difference
between success and failure at the enterprise level.
When a company seeks to relocate, it typically makes the mistake
of focusing on finding the appropriate property. This is often true
if the site selection process is being driven at corporate level.
However, selection of the property can often be the third or fourth
step when
considering a relocation or establishing a new location.
Furthermore, while property is a large percentage of every organisation’s
costs base, there are many other key “success” factors
that need to be considered prior to selecting the site. Many of
these factors will differ in definition and importance according
to the needs
of the business.
By applying a strategic planning methodology to location selection,
a company’s site can be more closely aligned with the company
business plan.
There are four key phases in a typical location analysis process:
- Project initiation and objective setting
- National/regional/city selection
- Analysis of short-listed locations and community
tours
- Implementation, negotiation and construction
PHASE 1: PROJECT INITIATION AND OBJECTIVE SETTING
This is the most critical step as it determines the key business
drivers for the location selection process. It is important that
key stakeholders are involved at this stage. We recommend the creation
of a Steering Committee, which typically includes location executives
and other stakeholders and decision-makers, such as human resource
teams, information and technology teams, finance teams, and key
business unit heads.
The project objectives and macro criteria relevant to the location
strategy are often determined through guided brainstorming sessions
that can have a secondary benefit of building common objectives
from different stakeholders in the business. This exercise will
also ensure that creating a new location or relocating an existing
operation is the correct business decision to implement.
Once the objectives of the overall project have been identified,
time frames and project plans are defined. Information regarding
existing property within the company would be gathered at this time
to identify potential constraints (for example, long-term lease
obligations) and/or opportunities (for example, collocation synergies)
within the current portfolio, and ultimately an exit plan, if required.
Communication is an essential process in projects such as these
and can often be a potential pitfall if not managed and guided appropriately.
The methodology applied to communication is very project specific;
however, an external consulting resource is often helpful in managing
this process. To ensure early communication and staff buy-in, a
staff communication policy can be formulated
during this phase, especially if the project requires international
relocations.
PHASE 2: NATIONAL/REGIONAL/CITY
SELECTION
During this phase, the process of identifying the micro criteria
commences. This is typically defined through a series of interviews
and questionnaires to formulate a profile of the appropriate micro
drivers and their respective weighting. The weighting will be defined
in accordance with the company’s business plan.
Initially, a geographic scope would be defined (for example, a firm
may decide to establish a European location). Once the geographic
scope is defined, the micro criteria would be used to narrow the
scope of the search. These can include image, labour cost and
accessibility, language skills, move costs, tax breaks and other
incentives, proximity to transportation, phasing of a move, among
others. Cities or regions are then identified and evaluated according
to the weighted importance of the micro factors. Labour availability
and cost is a standard micro criterion that is weighted heavily
in a location strategy, and often one that is considered too late
in the process. Consideration must be given to issues such as travel
times to work, available travel networks and public infrastructure.
Each of these factors also has an impact on the retention and severance
rates of existing employees and hence the cost of potential redundancies.
These factors would also be built into the model to evaluate respective
locations.
Once the markets are modelled, a refined short list of suitable
locations is established.
PHASE 3: ANALYSIS OF SHORT-LISTED
LOCATIONS AND COMMUNITY TOURS
Following the quantitative research of the previous two stages,
this phase commences with a detailed analysis of the specific locations.
Community tours and site visits would be included in this stage.
This allows the Steering Committee or key decision-makers to understand
the specifics of the labour market, real estate, connectivity and
other key items associated with the success of the project.
During this phase, a detailed analysis of the relocation of existing
labour would be undertaken (if applicable) and the preliminary recruitment
campaign would be initiated. Companies seeking to hire a large number
of candidates or candidates with specific qualifications would meet
with recruitment firms to determine if qualified candidates existed
within the specific market place. Other relevant employers may be
interviewed at this stage to determine overall satisfaction with
a specific location.
Once on-site tours have taken place, specific buildings would be
considered and an analysis would be conducted for each building.
This would include a full cost analysis, viability, and a pros and
cons report. The buildings would be ranked in the final selection
process.
During this process, companies and their consultants would meet
with local governments or economic development agencies to determine
the level of aid, grants, incentives or tax schemes that may be
available within a region. These incentives can have a dramatic
impact on the overall cost of a location. However, the process of
gaining Regional Selective Assistance and Grant Aid within the EU,
and securing Statutory and Discretionary incentives in the US, has
several pitfalls, including claw backs and other commitments that
can
disguise the medium and long-term risk of accepting some incentives.
A consultancy-based approach is recommended to secure the highest
value of incentives with the lowest proportion of risk to the enterprise.
The conclusion at this stage is to identify a single preferred location.
PHASE 4: IMPLEMENTATION
At the initiation of this phase, a summary of the findings including
an audit trail of approved and rejected options would be created.
Typically, the Steering Committee would reconvene following the
site visits to agree on the ranking of appropriate buildings within
the selected location.
Once a number of buildings have been identified, a negotiation strategy
would be established and discussions with the landlords/developers
would commence. Space planning and design work would be undertaken
at this stage to determine optimal
layouts and occupancy patterns. Final budgets are often authorised
during this stage as final costs are realised.
Once the final legal transaction has been completed, build-out and
construction would commence and telecommunications infrastructure
would be established. At the same time, staff communication regarding
potential relocations would be initiated.
In addition, training grants and economic incentives would be secured
at this stage.
The last stage is for the company to finalise its transition plan
and occupy its new premises.
For further information on site selection needs, please contact:
Sue Asprey
Director, CBRE
1a Wimpole Street, London, W1G 0RE
Tel: +44 (0)
207 182 2797
E-mail: sue.asprey@cbre.com
Darcy Frank Kotun
Senior Managing Director, CBRE Consulting
101 California Street, 44th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: +1 415
722 0249
E-mail: darcy.kotun@cbre.com
|